Common methodological limitations
Dec 13, 2021
The definition of a limitation is a restriction or a defect, or the act of imposing restrictions. When you are only allowed to walk to the end of the block, this is an example of a limitation. When there are certain things you are not good at doing, these are examples of limitations.
Qualitative research has many limitations which include possible small sample sizes, potential bias in answers, self-selection bias, and potentially poor questions from researchers.
Limitations of qualitative research
Apr 3, 2019
Strengths of survey research include its cost effectiveness, generalizability, reliability, and versatility. Weaknesses of survey research include inflexibility and lack of potential depth.
Disadvantages of Quantitative Research
Dec 4, 2020
Limitations of Quantitative Techniques :
Jan 7, 2021
Another weakness of the quantitative. Research is the information of contextual factors to helpMoreAnother weakness of the quantitative. Research is the information of contextual factors to help interpret the results or to explain variations are usually ignored.
Less prone to sampling bias Precise It is objective Quantitative experiments are useful for testing the results It is costly Inadequacy of numbers Less than 100% accuracy information are difficult to gather Error can be computed Data from questionnaires may be incomplete and inaccurate The numerical data can be ...
Limitations and weakness of quantitative research methods
Sep 7, 2016
Poor quality qualitative work can lead to misleading findings. Qualitative research alone is often insufficient to make population-level summaries. The research is not designed for this purpose, as the aim is not to generate summaries generalisable to the wider population.
Some weaknesses are, for instance, smaller sample size and time consuming. Quantitative research methods, on the other hand, involve a larger sample, and do not require relatively a longer time for data collection.
One of the limitations of quantitative research is that it's narrow focus means relationships and larger contexts can be missed, but the scientific method provides an escape hatch for quantitative research, the ability to replicate the study in another setting.
It clarifies why specific data points have been collected whilst others have been excluded. Without this, it is difficult to define an end point for a study or complete it within a reasonable time frame since no limits have been defined on the work that could take place.
Collis Hussey, 2003 claim that qualitative has low reliability and high validity, whereas quantitative data has high reliability and low validity. If it is so, then how it can be explained and proved? Join ResearchGate to ask questions, get input, and advance your work.
There is little incentive to retest, so many results obtained purely by chance are simply accepted without further research or scrutiny. The original results were a false positive. The replicated results were a false negative.
Because the reproducibility of empirical results is an essential part of the scientific method, such failures undermine the credibility of theories building on them and potentially of substantial parts of scientific knowledge.
It is very important that research can be replicated, because it means that other researchers can test the findings of the research. Replicability keeps researchers honest and can give readers confidence in research.
A replication study is a study that is an independent repetition of an earlier, published study, using sufficiently similar methods (along the appropriate dimensions) and conducted under sufficiently similar circumstances.